William Anderson wrote:Wow, thanks again for such kind words.
Eric, your pattern is just the ticket. I like the hackle on this very much. The Eastern sulphur nymphs have striking mottling (not anything you don't know) and I thought the golden pheasant tail fibers, with the lemon duck tails, offered the contrast that made for a good match. I hope to fish a pad hatch with you someday.
w
William, I apologize if your thread got hi-jacked here. I love these transitional softhackle patterns, and I try to tie most of my "user" flies with this in mind. I'm still trying to figure out a good way to incorporate CDC into them as I think this is a really "magic" ingredient for flies because of its extremely high "wiggle" factor in the water.
I like the woodduck flank because it gives a look of segmentation as does the ribbed PT abdomen. The burst of "dun" body color in the thorax is a trigger more because of the contrast I think than because of any special replication of the natural's color. I guess what I'm suggesting here is a fly that includes a number of trigger features may be productive even tho' it may not be taken because of any particularly good representation of the natural insect. The "motion" that CDC would add would add to this would be helpful I think.
BTW, all of this comes from the fact that my single most productive dryfly pattern over the past two years has been Hans Weilenmann's CDC & Elk. It produces irrespective of what natural insect is on the water, and I am firmly convinced its productivity comes from the motion the CDC fibers give the fly plus its suggestive silhouette. The only fly that challenges it is a decent, properly sized spinner pattern when a spinner fall is in progress.
Just some idle thought on a Sunday AM.
Eric