How Leisenring tied the Tups

Moderators: William Anderson, letumgo

User avatar
Soft-hackle
Site Admin
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:23 am
Location: Wellsville, NY

Re: How Leisenring tied the Tups

Post by Soft-hackle » Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:39 pm

Good points, Davy regarding the hackle. I generally tie in by the tip when hackling through the thorax for the reason you gave. It brings the longer fibers to the front of the fly so they taper back nicely.

Mark
"I have the highest respect for the skilled wet-fly fisherman, as he has mastered an art of very great difficulty.” Edward R. Hewitt

http://www.libstudio.com/FS&S
narcodog
Posts: 1224
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:44 pm

Re: How Leisenring tied the Tups

Post by narcodog » Sun Oct 31, 2010 10:31 am

That is a very interesting tie, in so much as it is not slim as most of the newer variations.
"I like beer, do you like beer, I like beer a lot."
User avatar
Hans Weilenmann
Posts: 2109
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:45 pm
Location: Amstelveen, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: How Leisenring tied the Tups

Post by Hans Weilenmann » Sun Oct 31, 2010 10:31 am

Hello again, Mike. Nice to see your name pop up on this thread.

Cheers,
Hans W
wayneb
Posts: 404
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 3:06 pm
Location: Port Tobacco, MD

Re: How Leisenring tied the Tups

Post by wayneb » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:17 pm

Hi Mike;

Glad to see you back!

Interesting fly the Tups, every example I've seen is slightly different. The example you posted, is that considered a wet or dry fly?

Also, what is the rear part of the abdomen composed of?

Wayneb
User avatar
redietz
Posts: 1727
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:21 pm
Location: Central Maryland

Re: How Leisenring tied the Tups

Post by redietz » Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:59 pm

Hans Weilenmann wrote:
redietz wrote:I've never personally bought into the idea that a fly shouldn't have a visible head -- real ones do.
Bob,

I am not sure what you mean by this observation. The eye of the hook is as pronounced a head as I need to mimic the natural 8-)

Cheers,
Hans "minimalist head" W
running & ducking
Nonsense. The eye on a straight-eyed hook has no profile at all when viewed from the side. You might as well completely leave off the body, because the shank and bend of the hook are all you'll ever need for that. Of course, Stewart/Baillie did pretty much just that with the Black Spider, but that's beside the point.

Kidding aside, I believe that the head on the fly is more of a representation of eyes (two, one, trout can't count) which on the males of most ephemerids are quite prominent, and often of a different color than the hook eye. And there have been times when I've caught fish on flies with a large, orange thread head when an otherwise identical fly with an inconspicuous black head produced nothing. The variables in fishing being what they are, I can't positively attribute the difference to the head (maybe the fish just turned on when I switched, maybe the flies sank at different rates, etc) but at least it's consistent with supposition.
Bob
Post Reply