How Leisenring tied the Tups

Moderators: William Anderson, letumgo

GlassJet
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:40 pm
Location: Peak District, UK

Re: How Leisenring tied the Tups

Post by GlassJet » Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:25 am

Soft-hackle wrote:Hi Mark,
I'm sure Mr. Hidy added this to the original manuscript. I find the Marabou floss ok, but it frays easily in rough hands. I think I mentioned this in the thread on silk threads. To use it properly, without fraying, Silk gloves are in order, very much like one would tie a salmon fly. If someone else has a better method, I'd like to hear about it. I have used a materials clip with some success if done very carefully, but by far, the gloves work best.

Mark
Mark, I've been using silk floss a bit recently, and the fraying is a bit of a pain. I find wetting it a little helps - just wet your fingers and run them along the length before wrapping. I don't go crazy for the stuff though...

Andrew.
"Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working." ~ Pablo Picasso 8)
Jerry G
Posts: 250
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:01 pm
Location: Beaver Dam Wisconsin USA

Re: How Leisenring tied the Tups

Post by Jerry G » Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:26 am

I post so seldom here I hesitate to bring this thought up. It did though just hit me as I was reading the most recent posts. You see I too have had to deal with silk or some of the floss threads fraying as I used them. Perfectionists I suppose we could be considered to at least some degree. Now none of my flies will make it to presentation class so why do I fret over a bit of snagging when hopefully a trout of some size will tear my fly to bits? :shock: :lol:

Regards, Jerry
User avatar
Soft-hackle
Site Admin
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:23 am
Location: Wellsville, NY

Re: How Leisenring tied the Tups

Post by Soft-hackle » Wed Oct 20, 2010 8:37 am

:lol: :lol:
That's right!
Mark
"I have the highest respect for the skilled wet-fly fisherman, as he has mastered an art of very great difficulty.” Edward R. Hewitt

http://www.libstudio.com/FS&S
User avatar
redietz
Posts: 1727
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:21 pm
Location: Central Maryland

Re: How Leisenring tied the Tups

Post by redietz » Wed Oct 20, 2010 11:44 pm

Jim Slattery wrote: Great meeting you and your son over the summer.
I use the push pins with the plastic handles.
Jim
It was good to meet you, too.
How frequently do you not use a bobbin holder?
Bob
Jim Slattery
Site Admin
Posts: 334
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:05 pm
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana
Contact:

Re: How Leisenring tied the Tups

Post by Jim Slattery » Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:34 pm

I tie all of my wingless wets without a bobbin holder. Other flies I use a bobbin holder.
I just like the "feel" I get tying without a bobbin holder.
Jim
User avatar
Hans Weilenmann
Posts: 2109
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:45 pm
Location: Amstelveen, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: How Leisenring tied the Tups

Post by Hans Weilenmann » Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:54 am

redietz wrote:I've never personally bought into the idea that a fly shouldn't have a visible head -- real ones do.
Bob,

I am not sure what you mean by this observation. The eye of the hook is as pronounced a head as I need to mimic the natural 8-)

Cheers,
Hans "minimalist head" W
running & ducking
User avatar
tie2fish
Posts: 5072
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:11 am
Location: Harford County, MD

Re: How Leisenring tied the Tups

Post by tie2fish » Sat Oct 30, 2010 10:10 am

I had never thought about it that way, Hans, but you are right ... the finishing thread wraps could be considered as more of a neck than a head (unless, of course, you're tying a pattern that specifies a built-up head). For all we know, even the tippet knot might be viewed by fish as being part of the "head".
Some of the same morons who throw their trash around in National parks also vote. That alone would explain the state of American politics. ~ John Gierach, "Still Life with Brook Trout"
User avatar
Soft-hackle
Site Admin
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:23 am
Location: Wellsville, NY

Re: How Leisenring tied the Tups

Post by Soft-hackle » Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:47 pm

Okay, we've switched gears hear a bit, but I thought I just add, when I was learning to tie, it was always stressed, I believe, to make sure to leave enough room on the hook to "finish the head". So, I always have. I've got to get use to tying smaller heads.

Anyway, on Catskill dries, about 1/32" is left bare hook after wrapping and tying down the hackle.

Mark
"I have the highest respect for the skilled wet-fly fisherman, as he has mastered an art of very great difficulty.” Edward R. Hewitt

http://www.libstudio.com/FS&S
User avatar
Hans Weilenmann
Posts: 2109
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:45 pm
Location: Amstelveen, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: How Leisenring tied the Tups

Post by Hans Weilenmann » Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:51 pm

Soft-hackle wrote:I thought I just add, when I was learning to tie, it was always stressed, I believe, to make sure to leave enough room on the hook to "finish the head". So, I always have. I've got to get use to tying smaller heads.
Mark,

I also always make sure to leave enough room on the hook to "finish the head" - I just do not leave a great deal of room 8-)

Cheers,
Hans W
Davyfly
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:56 pm
Location: Arkansas..USA
Contact:

Re: How Leisenring tied the Tups

Post by Davyfly » Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:10 pm

The tups a fly innovated by one R.S.Austin of Devon County, so far as known records it was assumed that he was responsible for passing this on the Skues.
It has always been one of my favorite soft hackles and dressed with a fine rooster hackle a dry. There are many known variations, both related to the nature of the dubbing used for the body and the hackle.
The hackle almost certainly was of a honey dun shade, not so easy to find today. If you are able to obtain some of the Aracana breeds they are just about perfect.
My tying is simply Pearsalls yellow thread, thorax is a mix of natural/yellow/red seal fur, at 3/5-1/5-1/5

So far as the issue of how a soft hackles should be tied in.
We must remember that known techniques of tying were very different 100 years ago, in many cases the waxed thread was 1/2 hitched at various stages during the tying of the fly. And in many cases tied by hand with no vice.
Aside from that when dealing with very delicate and small hackles the method of tying in the hackle by the stem is most preferred, it is very difficult due to the delicate fibers the tie teh hackle by the tip and then make secure winds without it breaking.
Further if for example you take say a regular partridge hackle and tie it in by the tip or by the stem, before the fly body is produced you will effect a different wind to the finished fly.
One reason being that when tied in by the stem you will wind the longer fibers to short, by the tip it is opposite shorter to longer.
Spiders ideally should be wound with the stem tied in first.
It is common practice now days for hackles to be wound after the fly body is produced, which is well ok, the difference is that they are often wound way to heavy.

Davy
www.davywotton.com
Outfitter/guide services/FF DVDs/Custom/ flies

Post Reply