Post
by Tom Smithwick » Mon Oct 05, 2015 7:46 am
Hi William - The rods are very close in taper. Basically, I removed a localized dip in the butt section that was probably an accident in the original Thomas taper to begin with, and I revised the top 15" of the tip into the convex dip you can see on the chart. I used a lightweight truncated ferrule to help preserve the full flexing feel of the rod. The small weight saving matters on a light taper like this. On a fast taper, not so much.
Rod design is a tricky business. There are various methods of going about it, some intuitive, and some highly scientific. All will get you "on the paper" as the shooters say, but getting exactly what you want often comes down to some trial and error. The reason that there is only one tip is that I wanted to try out the new scheme before I built the second. The cane is all split and ready to go, in this case, I am making no changes. That does not mean everyone will like it. One of the guys I learned from once told me "It is impossible to make a fly rod so good that everyone will like it, but also impossible to make one so bad that nobody will like it". As an amateur, I only have to please myself, but this one is getting very good reviews.