No doubt (would love to see a pic), I come across very few patterns that I haven't seen or tried a similar one. There are thousands of combinations of materials out there, but they aren't limitless, and there is really only so much you can do with a hook especially under the parameters of a wingless wet. I don't know if I've ever came up with a pattern that I would be comfortable fulling taking credit for. I'm willing to bet throughout history there has been a multitude of events of one fisherman "introducing a fly pattern" and receiving credit for it when in actuality it has been in someone else's box for a long time.fflutterffly wrote:I'm beginning to believe there are no more original patterns. This is not to say the Ke-he isn't your original patten, but I've tied something very similar (recently) thinking it was an AH Ha moment. It's a red fox squirrel with a hot orange spot of Antron instead of the z-lon. OR we an think of it like this: Great minds think alike. Now I just have to think of a great mind to ask. As soon as my camera battery arrives I'll shoot a photo of it. And by the way... it's a killer fly idea you had and I stoled. olol Catches fish like a net on a stick.
I like to look to classic patterns for inspiration. I enjoy thoroughly tying the classics as they are described, but 95% of them were not tied for my waters and need a little adjustment. Fly style doesn't impede me either, steelhead, salmon, warmwater, lake, dry, winged, nymph...you name it. I'll look at what I find an interesting trigger in a certain pattern and try to morph it into a wingless wet. I have lived where I am now for only 6 years and just this year I really started to get a handle in settling on patterns that seem to stand out locally for whatever reason. This pattern started out as a steelhead pattern, like I mentioned earlier, and came about as I was surfing the web looking at wet flies with a subtle hot spot trigger that I could tie bigger for our trouty steelhead.