Moderators: William Anderson, letumgo
-
daringduffer
- Posts: 2195
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:11 am
Post
by daringduffer » Sat Jun 29, 2013 4:00 pm
William Anderson wrote:daringduffer wrote:I have no doubt after seeing John Shaner's collection, my tying will shift a bit.
William,
When you find the time, would you please elaborate ein wenig on this? To me, these flies shows passion. I have deliberately been overdressing a few flies lately, with the intention to try how they fish compared to sparser ones. They are caddis pupa patterns (turmeric cat's underfur and two turns of full woodcock hackle). I will try them along with comparable skinny flies. Since they will fish att different depths due to floating/sinking properties it will be difficult to draw any conclusions - at least for me. Some people are able to draw conclusions out of nothing. I lack that capacity.
dd
Stefan, my comment about John's collection was only was we've all seen in the color plates and pics of historic flies tied with longer hackles and different types of hackles for different behaviors. I haven't had any issues with effectiveness using the flies I've tied over the past several years, but getting to see so many vintage flies and images with their hackles standing perpendicular to the shank for even forward a bit, and with lengths that extend well beyond the hook bend, I'll probably add some of these to my boxes as well, just for comparison sake. Their must be something to the proportions used when such attention to detail was given to every other aspect of the designs. Just something else to fool around with.
I didn't have any luck with the skimpy flies yesterday (primrose and honey dun Stewarts spider) , but it could have had everything to do with the conditions. Nothing worked well, so I wouldn't make any conclusions based on yesterday's outing either.
w
Thank you for the explanation. I have linked to this before:
http://www.flyforums.co.uk/fly-tying-fo ... -blue.html
Not the usual tidy fly you find today.
dd
-
Kelly L.
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:09 pm
- Location: Texas
Post
by Kelly L. » Sun Jun 30, 2013 11:24 am
I think the fly looks awesome, just the way it is!!!
-
letumgo
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13346
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:55 pm
- Location: Buffalo, New York
-
Contact:
Post
by letumgo » Sun Jun 30, 2013 11:31 pm
Stefan - Lance took many photos of the Rodger Woolley flies in John Shaner's collection. I hope Lance gets a chance to share his photos with us, after he finishes working on his book.
-
daringduffer
- Posts: 2195
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:11 am
Post
by daringduffer » Mon Jul 01, 2013 11:26 am
letumgo wrote:Stefan - Lance took many photos of the Rodger Woolley flies in John Shaner's collection. I hope Lance gets a chance to share his photos with us, after he finishes working on his book.
I look forward to both. Meantime, can you talk John Shaner into sending me his collection for a closer inspection..?
dd
-
CM_Stewart
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:17 pm
- Location: New York City
-
Contact:
Post
by CM_Stewart » Mon Jul 22, 2013 7:19 am
Got a chance to fish a skimpy skimpy yesterday (actually, I ALWAYS have the chance, yesterday I actually did it). I did my standard length sakasa kebari head, which on viewing the photo I realize is twice too long. Next time I'll start further back from the eye. Forgive the focus on the fish shot, it just would not sit still for the camera.
-
William Anderson
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4569
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:14 pm
- Location: Ashburn, VA 20148
-
Contact:
Post
by William Anderson » Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:33 am
Chris, I would love to get out and drift some skimpy spiders today. Your pics make want to drop everything and go. I love your minimalist kebari. Just goes to show what's possible. Thanks.
"A man should not try to eliminate his complexes, but rather come into accord with them. They are ultimately what directs his conduct in the world." Sigmund Freud.
www.WilliamsFavorite.com