William's Favourite

Moderators: William Anderson, letumgo

DOUGSDEN
Posts: 2510
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:57 pm
Location: Sardis, Ohio

Re: William's Favourite

Post by DOUGSDEN » Sun Feb 07, 2010 7:52 pm

Excuse me everyone. My spelling us usually very bad. After reading another book this afternoon, his name was William Lunn not "Lund".
Thanx fur under-sanding,
Dugsden
Fish when you can, not when you should! Anything short of this is just a disaster.
User avatar
redietz
Posts: 1727
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:21 pm
Location: Central Maryland

Re: William's Favourite

Post by redietz » Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:15 pm

Where was Williams from, though? The heavier hackle might a regional thing, rather than a time-period thing.
Bob
User avatar
Old Hat
Posts: 4208
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:24 am
Location: Where Deet is a Cologne
Contact:

Re: William's Favourite

Post by Old Hat » Mon Feb 08, 2010 5:56 pm

I must have missed this one. Great fly Andrew. Add a very sparse red wool tag and you have a Reid's Assassin, one my favorites and my go to pattern on #18 for midges.
I hate it when I think I'm buying organic vegetables, and when I get home I discover they are just regular donuts.
http://www.oldhatflytying.com
mvendon
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 8:50 am
Location: Westerlo, New York

Re: William's Favourite

Post by mvendon » Mon Feb 08, 2010 6:17 pm

redietz wrote:Where was Williams from, though? The heavier hackle might a regional thing, rather than a time-period thing.
Hi Bob,

He has Stratford-on-Avon below his name on the introduction in the book. He also listed many of the rivers he had fished. He made one trip to the USA and Canada at one point also. He wrote that he purposely listed all the rivers and streams that he had fished to emphasize that his experience wasn't confined to one particular river, or any one part of the country. He had written Trout Flies: A Discussion and a Dictionary several years before this one was published. He received many comments and suggestions from readers of that book. From those suggestions, he concentrated on the most popular and highly used patterns AND what was considered the correct dressing for each of those patterns (around 400 dressings). It's the only book that has the correct original dubbing mix listed what was used in the Tup's, and the reason that I bought it a couple of years ago now. Since then, I just keep going back to it because it has all of these classic ties with quite a bit of information on how they came about, who came up with what dressing etc.

Regards,
Mark
User avatar
redietz
Posts: 1727
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:21 pm
Location: Central Maryland

Re: William's Favourite

Post by redietz » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:10 am

I guess my point is that he, and presumedly not his father either, were from the North Country, so we can't extrapolate from his opinion to how things were usually done in, say, Yorkshire. For this fly in particular, however, I guess we can pretty much take his tying as the "correct" one.

I need to get that book.
Bob
Post Reply