data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de002/de002291118310176b75924ac472dbde8f079ca2" alt="Smile :)"
I suppose one of the first tasks for me as a beginner in this method is getting a reasonable selection of flies that should in theory work on the preferred river. In that regard the knowledge you already have of your local fly life , matched with whats readily available in print and on forums such as this makes this task pretty straight forward. My next step is getting the materials and developing the tying skills ... not too daunting, and a task to warm up the cold winter days and nights. That achieved it will be a "Simple"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad669/ad6690afa5e2926a4f488a3875b15e62234364e8" alt="Shocked :shock:"
Purely from a fly dressing perspective the biggest shock to the system is that so many of the sucessful patterns are merely silk and hackle. All my experience to date with nymphs and dries would suggest that bodys of mixed dubbing or whatever generally outfish those of bland single colour. I realise that I may be better served to put aside everything I have ever learned and treat this as a brand new experience and start at the bottom and not on the 2nd floor. I do also realise that a fly rod and a fly will not catch a trout, how that fly is fished , where it is fished and when it is fished are the keys to unlocking success.
I would not dare stand on generations of experience and suggest patterns such as a Partridge and Orange would be improved by a little touch dubbing similar to the Waterhen Bloa. - but I can't help but have such sacreligious thoughts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7e98/d7e98961a926254fe8b151fef39f253cf117941e" alt="Very Happy :D"
Any opinions anyone ?